The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrates current situation of a central library's floor comparing to the plan 20 years ago.
Overall, there were some arrangements in the library's interior whereas the entrance remained as it used to be. There are also new machines and furnitures equipped.
In the middle of the public library, tables and chairs were removed, leaving spacious path from the entrance to four corners. The enquiry desk to the right from the entrance were replaced by a coffee shop and its services can be found at information desk. Adult fiction and non-fiction books' areas are now smaller, leaving space for brand new reference books.
New self-services machines and sofas have been installed to organize storytelling events next to children's fiction books' area as well as to be more convenient. Lecture room has replaced the old children's books area. The reading room was also demolished to build a new computer room.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-14 | 123456abcxyz | 11 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | 123456abcxyz | 11 | view |
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 78
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and the plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and the plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, well, whereas, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68560773176 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.673333333333 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2608007661 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0988838511123 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430299353054 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828490545531 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086222055218 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109660405717 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.