The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps illustrate the transformation of the central library on its arrangements over two decades.
The whole structure from now compared to 20 years ago is completely different. Starting with the entrance, going ahead and stopping at the center of the library, tables, and chairs have been removed, leaving the blank space. The current library moved the adult fiction books zone from the left to the right hand and added an information desk and self-service machine there. The old place of fiction for adults is now replaced by the shelter for reference books. Next to the entrance, looking on the left, the reading room is substituted by the computer room. The cafeteria is opposite the computer room, which used to be an enquiry desk that gave service, the shape of the cafeteria' land is squarer than the previous one.
Last but not least is the zone for children. Children's books room is located at the corner of the right now used for lecture room. It then moved to the opposite area of the room for the lecture view. The space for children is slightly expanded as well as enhancing activities for them, particularly is the storytelling events. There have been two sofas already and content for children is now entirely focused on fiction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-14 | 123456abcxyz | 11 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | 123456abcxyz | 11 | view |
| 2024-05-11 | Tường Vân | 11 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
- The graphs below show the development of Brindell from 1800 to 2000 Summarize the key features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 61
- The graphs below show the development of Brindell from 1800 to 2000 Summarize the key features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graphs below show the development of Brindell from 1800 to 2000 Summarize the key features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8691588785 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57408356366 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579439252336 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9607616719 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0732580993357 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300423545316 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416289370664 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0465471096865 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296218530408 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.