The diagram illustrates various steps of the process which are involved in production of canned pears.
In general, it is obvious that producing canned pears is a complex process requiring the assistance of both handiwork and machines through fourteen stages in total, before being transported to food stores and supermarkets.
In the initial stage of the process, pears are picked by hands before being delivered to a factory. At the canning facility, pears are washed and then they are checked for a high quality, which ensures there is no dirt on them. After passing the quality control step, pears are kept in cold storage in order to reach a better food standard.
In the next stage, the fruit is weighted and graded with thoroughness. Following this, their skins are peeled and sliced into some small pieces to be put into cans. Once pear cans are sealed, they are cooked with a high temperature with the aim of being sterilized. Prior to being placed in the storage, canned pears are labelled carefully. The process concludes with canned pears which are despatched to supermarkets and food stalls for commercial sale.
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010 56
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 67
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- Some people think that if a country is already rich any addition in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 67
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04255319149 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57422629425 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61170212766 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3752399374 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196962907406 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822340426756 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051946020352 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1267347579 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381574137737 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.