Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both views and give your own opinion

The tendency of keeping wild species in zoos has aroused waves of controversies in recent times. While many reckon that zoos are ideal places for protecting wild animals, others and I hold the view that zoos should be closed down because of some detrimental effects.

It is undeniable that zoos play an integral part in saving wild animals. The most significant merit is that zoos support humans to research work and broaden their horizons about wild species. The vast majority of people including students and adults are able to witness these animals and understand more about animals’ daily life environment. Another factor is that observing wild animals close up inspires individuals to embrace the spirit of protecting species. A compelling example is that once a child has a higher chance to find out about a bear thanks to a zoo, he can be sympathetic and he will foster his love for saving bears. Accordingly, zoos appear to be immensely beneficial for both facilitating people’s learning progress and boost citizens’ awareness to conserve animals.

However, it is indisputable that zoos bring some pitfalls to a huge number of wild species. First and foremost, these animals have to live in numerous cramped cages which kill their animal's right to freedom. Wild species are in desperate need of natural habitat, social structure and companionship to live during their entire life. Therefore, captive animals may become depressed and institutionalized when they are being cooped up in unnatural environments like prisons. The second demerit is that wild species can harm everyone due to being a public spectacle for entertainment. With the aim of enriching rapidly, a lot of animals are trained to perform on shows to appeal to more visitors, whereas animals are not keen on performing because of their natural behaviors. This leads to the anger and many accidents caused to their trainers and audiences by species.

In conclusion, although keeping wild animals in zoos has some benefits for citizens, I strongly believe that animals deserve to live in the wild and zoos’ operations should be stopped.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 729, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to progress'
Suggestion: to progress
...for both facilitating people’s learning progress and boost citizens’ awareness to conser...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, whereas, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20408163265 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80818106307 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583090379009 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9282747212 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5625 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35747978901 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11199098794 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904971791569 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252187366281 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721397898563 0.056905535591 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.