The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015

The given table demonstrates the comparision of two selected primary schools, including school A and school B, with seven problematic ranges in studying of children in the two years 2005 and 2015.

As can be seen, following instructions and handwriting were the biggest number in 2005 and in 2015 respectively. Students in school B who got educational problems was in very low number which compared to shool A.

In 2005, following and concentration instructions were similar in their range indicators of school A. Following lessons having the highest digit amongst of two areas. However, both following and concentration in classes decreased dramatically to 18 in 2015. Listening skills and verbal expression of ideas shared the same digit with 35 students in 2005 before experiencing a significant decline by nearly 10% in 2015. While spelling witnessed a fall by 5% after five years, reading ability saw a slight rise by 1%. Handwriting in school A maintained stable throughout the two years with 28%.

The range of indicators for concentration in lessons and idea expression in school B were on top with about 15% in 2005 and 2015. The lowest number in 2005 belonged to those who are unable to follow instructions (6%), whereas the smallest number was of handwriting in 2015 (7%).

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry low number which compared to shool A. In 2005, following and concentration ins...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11848341232 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0153057741 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559241706161 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.053903108 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1818181818 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282656585531 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102465462975 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854429618827 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191333278179 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883730218351 0.0819641961636 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.