The diagram below shows the percentage of good quality river water in four countries
from 1995 to 2010. It also shows the prediction for 2018. Summarise the information by
selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Line graph provided the information about the proportion of river water in high quality in four nations from 1995 to 2010.
It is clear that around 95 % of good quality water in country A by 1995. From then on, the water quality was moderately increased from 2000 to 2010 and reached almost 97 percentage. Between 2013 and 2010 the river water in high quality was slightly declined that peaked at around 95 percentage.
Country B and country C was similar percentage of good quality water by 1995. But the country C figure was considerable increased from 2008 which was 86 %. However, the ratio of country B was started steadily increased and is predicted to reached 93 % by 2018. After 2008, good quality in river water was rapidly rose and it is peaked at about 95 % in 2018.
The worst qualities river water was fluctuated between 1995 and 2008, it was very lesser percentage than country A. The figure of good quality in water River was minimally declined next period which was decreased around 10 % in 2018.
Overall, it is observed country A of beginning percentage and end up percentage was equally throughout the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut the country C figure was considerable increased from 2008 which was 86 %. Howe...
^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as 86 %. However, the ratio of country B was started steadily increased and is pr...
^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d steadily increased and is predicted to reached 93 % by 2018. After 2008, good q...
^^
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'qualities'' or 'quality's'?
Suggestion: qualities'; quality's
...eaked at about 95 % in 2018. The worst qualities river water was fluctuated between 1995...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an country A. The figure of good quality in water River was minimally declined ne...
^^
Line 4, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d next period which was decreased around 10 % in 2018. Overall, it is observed c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81443298969 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56481348748 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469072164948 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.2947228372 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.9090909091 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.63636363636 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272776221165 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145285752426 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631731601231 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180194988584 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530767255598 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.