THE DIAGRAM BELOW SHOWS A POSSIBLE FUTURE MEANS OF HOME ENERGY PRODUCTION

Essay topics:

THE DIAGRAM BELOW SHOWS A POSSIBLE FUTURE MEANS OF HOME ENERGY PRODUCTION.

The diagram describes the process of manu manufacturing energy at home in the future.
As can be seen from the diagrams, the process involves several stages, beginning with fermenting different composts to produce methane gas and finishing with the readily-used electricity in the battery.
In particular, the waste such as leaves, food, scraps and the like will be filled in a steel tank, together with water until they account for three quarters of the tank. They will be fermented to release methane gas. Then, the gas will be released through pipes to get to the methane gas storage before being transmitted to a compressor. After turning into a compressed state, the gas will be moved to the combustion engine, in which the gas will be converted into energy, but in mechanical form. Subsequently, it will go to the generator for the final transformation into electricity. Finally, all of the energy will be stored in the battery, ready for residential use.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ansformation into electricity. Finally, all of the energy will be stored in the battery, r...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, then, in particular, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0375 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88314064867 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60625 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4747410301 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0440519812768 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031943005706 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066620256953 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713475894237 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925112039222 0.0819641961636 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.