The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The diagram demonstrates how aluminium cans are collected andcoverted into new ones.
Overall, it can be seen that there are 7 prominent steps in this process, beginning with aluminium cans thrown in the trash and finishing with reused products.
First, when used aluminium cans are in the recycle bin, they are accumulated with and delivered with lorries to the factory responsible for recycling. It is followed by the cleaning stage involving getting rid of impurities, then people sort them into different categories. Next, aluminium cans are shredded and compressed into patches. They are heated and melt at comparatively high temperatures for the purpose of getting aluminium liquid.
The aluminium sheet is formed from that liquid before rolled with 2.5mm-6mm thick. At the following stage, aluminium rolls are used in order to produce new aluminium cans. Finally, these cans are refilled with distinct beverages and sold in stores, which take up 74 percent of aluminum cans in the UK.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-29 Nguyen Thinh 67 view
2024-11-22 hahoaan 73 view
2024-11-20 Giang Tran 78 view
2024-11-11 hahoaan 84 view
2024-11-10 Giang Tran 84 view
Essays by user hien3112 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e purpose of getting aluminium liquid. The aluminium sheet is formed from that ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31012658228 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74249350586 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651898734177 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2319083433 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2222222222 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163513787944 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728696707855 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405207345106 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110822603602 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150658187137 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.