The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given process illustrates the procedure for recycling cans made of aluminium.
Overall, there is a series of steps, beginning with disposing of used cans and finishing with recusing recycled cans. It is also noticeable that the recycled cans take up 74% in the United Kingdom.
At the beginning of the process, the aluminium cans are thrown into the designated waste baskets. They are then collected and transported to the factory for further processing. After being washed plus classified. The cans are put into a special machine for being cut into small pieces and pressed under high pressure.
In this stage of the process, the laminated aluminium is heated with adequate temperature to be melted. Following this, it is rotated flat with the thickness from 2.5mm to 6mm for different purposes. After that, it is recycled into new cans and filled with liquids. Finally, the cans are delivered to consumption points. It is estimated that the percentage of recycled aluminium cans throughout the UK is 74%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-28 taoxanh99 80 view
2024-06-27 taoxanh99 78 view
2024-06-24 nguyendangquang.aspect 78 view
2024-06-24 nguyendangquang.aspect 67 view
2024-06-20 nobitaa 67 view
Essays by user nguyendangquan… :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12048192771 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71889033234 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596385542169 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.1284131077 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.8333333333 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8333333333 22.9334400587 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180372996527 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746573567776 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602367882442 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129318797571 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458121047586 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.