The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The diagram depicts how aliminium drinks cans are recycled through a number of steps.
Overall, there are seven stages, begin with cans being sorted at the collection center, continue with the melting process that happened in the aluminium recycling plant, and this procedure ends with the beverage cans being distributed to shops or vending machines.
The progress starts with sorting out two types of old cans from the recycling bin, which are made of steel and aluminium. Following this, the separated cans will be moved to the recycling center by trucks.
After being transported to the recycling facility, another process happening in the aluminium recycling plant began. To begin with, the old aluminium cans are crushed and then melted down in a pot. After this stage, the aforementioned cans will turn into new aluminium bars. As soon as these bars have been created, they will go through a stage after which thin sheets are formed and rolled up. This smaller process end with the new drink cans being created. Once they are made, fruit juice or water will be filled within and those beverage drinks will then be distributed to vending machines for consumption.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 80
- In the last decade there has been a great increase in the number and variety of online courses available to adults This has been welcomed as a great opportunity by many students however other students see these courses as less effective than classroom tea 84
- The 2 maps below show the changes that have taken place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001 Summarise the best relevant points and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 89
- The 2 maps below show the changes that have taken place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001 Summarise the best relevant points and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05670103093 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41873444825 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59793814433 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.5410658882 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175619033156 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08867142158 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418303810072 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129812534322 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344717038066 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.