The diagram details the process by which pots made from ceramics are manufactured.
The diagram details the process by which pots made from ceramics are manufactured.
Overall, it is clear that there are three main steps to this entirely man-made process, beginning with the collection of the raw material, followed by its processing at the factory, and finishing with the colourisation also operated at the premises.
In the initial stages, using a digger machine, substance is collected from the ground before being loaded into trucks and taken to a nearby factory where it undergoes three main stages to form the shape. Firstly, extracted material is loaded in a crusher for the initial, rather rough, grind, from where it proceeds to a second step of grinding, which involves a finer equipment. It is then transferred to a mixing pot with water that is coming from a tap above it. Flowing through a pipe, a newly created liquid enters the moulds, where it is left for dying for up to six hours, and once sufficient time has passed, the assembled clay pots are coming out from the opened forms.
The last stages involve heating up the ceramic pots in the oven at about 1000 degrees celsius, as well as subsequent manual colouring performed by dipping the object into the paint bucket. Before the finished goods leave the factory, they are returned to the heated oven for a final round of colour firing.
- The reading passage argues that R robustus was unlikely to be a predator However the lecturer provides the evidence in favour of the idea that the stated mammal could have been a successful hunter 70
- Which of the following choices do you think has the greatest impact on environmental protection A governmental regulations B environmental awareness groups C individual effort 65
- The graphs give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the same years 84
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live Do you agree or disagree 60
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... main stages to form the shape. Firstly, extracted material is loaded in a crushe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, second, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86343612335 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4841831155 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629955947137 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0344725142 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295548352613 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159074928999 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.245247488711 0.0843802449381 291% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27045835564 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.307947331535 0.0819641961636 376% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.