Some people believe that radio is the best way to get news while others think that TV is better for this purpose. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People receives news from various sources such as internet, television, radio and so on. Fewer citizens believe that to get news, the most effective method is to get deal with the radio. However, others argue that, television is the best purpose to obtain news. This essay looks into both perspectives.
To begin with, listening news on the radio has also some advantages. Firstly, it is fast method because it mainly works on the internet. For instance, in the morning if you go for the jogging then you can put radio in a pin pocket and listen to the latest radio news that what is happening around the world. Secondly, news on the radio is also different that the radio newsreader has to describe news in detail without any hesitation. To illustrate, if a sports match is going on, then the radio commentators will have to speak more than the television commentator. So, radio is a portable device that you can carry in the pocket all around the globe.
On the other hand, television also play an important role in the news. Firstly, watching news on the television will give you sight and sound. For example, if you only hear the news about an accident then you will forget it soon, but if you have seen the images on the television, then you may not forget it for a while. Secondly, today, there are many applications are available on the internet. So, from that you can download it on your phone. The application like 'Aaj Tak news' which enable people to watch news. Therefore, television is a good way to receive news.
In conclusion , this essay discussed both views. However, I believe that television has an edge over the radio because of its visual effects.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-05 | Hafween | 84 | view |
2019-04-25 | Mikul Patel | 61 | view |
- The table below gives information about population of over 60 year olds in six regions in 2000 and the predicted number of population over 60 in 2050 It also shows the world population over 60 in 2000 and 2050 Summarise the information in the following th 85
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003. 56
- The diagram shows the plan of medical center in 2008 and 2010 76
- The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults (aged 16 years and over) whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 67
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...od way to receive news. In conclusion , this essay discussed both views. Howeve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70068027211 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51882883644 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540816326531 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6566350152 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.7368421053 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4736842105 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84210526316 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275705806544 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859260179499 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474861485365 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174778907482 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469201547296 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.0946893788 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.