the diagrams below give information about two main road tunnels in one Australian city
The map demonstrates a project to build the two road tunnels in one Australian city in two periods time between 1987 to 1992 and 2004 to 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the infrastructure for each tunnel had a big difference. Noticeable, the cost of building the two tunnels.
Looking at the map in more detail, the tunnel A had appeared earlier and complete which before the tunnel B was a renovation in 2004. The second difference of tunnel A was established under a bridge, while tunnel B was refurbishing after destroying the river and replaced by sand and stones. Besides, the cost of renovation of the tunnel B was higher than that of tunnel A, from 556 million dollars to 1.1 million dollars.
Moreover, both depth and length in the tunnel A were shorter, with 25 meters and 2.2 kilometers, whereas tunnel B with 35 meters and 3.6 kilometers. Finally, both cross-section tubes of two tunnels that connect at both ends and allow different genres of transport such as a car, bus, truck and so on
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-07 | letrang250191 | 11 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | myduyen282 | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-02 | lucluc | view | |
| 2022-03-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
- the diagrams below give information about two main road tunnels in one Australian city 67
- the diagrams below give information about two main road tunnels in one Australian city 78
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate 20
- The table below shows thenumbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 73
- The diagram show the stages involed in the process of making leather goods 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, if, look, moreover, second, so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67796610169 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77659331892 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604519774011 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6561267526 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220590873488 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095833621427 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770665191452 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143234124412 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901530008556 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.