The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chart shows four modes of transport in Edmonton and the percentage use of each by people living in the city. The table illustrates the reasons why the residents of Edmonton use their cars.
Overall, cars are used in preference to other means of transport. The principal reason why people use their cars in the city is commuting to work. It is clear from the percentages shown in the pie chart, that travel by car is the highest figure, at 45%. This is followed by LRT at 35%, while travel by bus or taxi each represent only 10%.
The table compares five reasons why people use their cars in Edmonton. The reasons given relate mainly to work, with a figure of 55% for commuting and 45% for business. However, taking children to school is also high on the list, at 40%. Using the car for shopping is recorded at 15% and the same figure is given for leisure activities.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-26 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-10-26 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-10-13 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-10-13 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-10-13 Giang Tran 73 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, second, so, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81437125749 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63769566413 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568862275449 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.6612557346 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.4 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131830444039 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058917489523 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385907625863 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924064159358 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374044747146 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.