The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.
Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are three maps concerning the transformation at West Park Secondary School in 3 specific years, called 1050, 1980 and 2010. It is perceptible that there have been a drastic change from a fairly simple area to a more modern one while the opposite is true fỏ the bottom right-hand corner.
In 1950, the school was located right on the roadside, adjacent to the main road. To the left-hand side of the school, that was the resident's houses. In the southern part of the map, this was the location of farmland and playground.
In 1980, the most prominent of modification has been the replacement of science block and car park of the houses. At the same time, the farmland was demolished to build a new sports field. The playground remained the same.
After 30 years, in 2010, the expansion of the car park lot encroached on the sports field. This made the sports field narrower on the right-hand side of the current car park. At this period, the school, the science block, the playground did not alter
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The maps show the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69491525424 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5596400446 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581920903955 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9998747806 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5454545455 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90909090909 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131468489146 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048864996484 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418105627228 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078270367095 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338309173963 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.