The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The bar graph and table chart show the main three reason to employees chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home in the year 2019. This charts information calibirated in percentage.
It can seen crystal clear that there were almost simliar men and women main reason was save money in the year 2019(42-45%). However, only 11% females chose to work from home for more productive. It was approximately males double interested as compared to males 24%. There was only 4% men work from home main reason for easier chid care. The females was near by 6 times more than interested to mens 26%.
Continuing, it can be observed the tabular chart that there was 74% women worked under 10 hours of per week. It opposite side only 3% males was worked. By contrast, there was 16% males in 10 to 30 hours of work per week. It was only 5% increased females work from home as compared to males which was 81% male worked for over 30 hours per week. While, only 6% of women worked from home over the 30 hours of work per week.
In summary, it may be deduced thatthe highest males employees work from home for to save money. While, the lowest females workers over 30 hours worked from home in the year 2019.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-02-15 Trịnh Trí Dũng 89 view
2022-02-06 pateldhruv1708 67 view
2021-11-20 Elahe Rasooli 78 view
2021-10-05 Muhammad Hassam Saeed view
2021-10-05 Muhammad Hassam Saeed view
Essays by user pateldhruv1708 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'see' or 'be seen'?
Suggestion: see; be seen
...tion calibirated in percentage. It can seen crystal clear that there were almost si...
^^^^
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[5]
Message: You should probably use: 'were'.
Suggestion: were
...eason for easier chid care. The females was near by 6 times more than interested to...
^^^
Line 2, column 351, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...n for easier chid care. The females was near by 6 times more than interested to mens 26...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...male worked for over 30 hours per week. While, only 6% of women worked from home over...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'thatthe the highest'.
Suggestion: thatthe the highest
...er week. In summary, it may be deduced thatthe highest males employees work from home for to s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oyees work from home for to save money. While, the lowest females workers over 30 hou...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, may, so, while, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43303571429 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15476139092 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450892857143 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6448550797 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.9285714286 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428840180397 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181429336274 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138433637148 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325257082393 0.15604864568 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924794823246 0.0819641961636 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 13.2329268293 56% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.47 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.