The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site
in 2024.
The maps below compare the difference between the location of a school in 2004 and the future plan of the same site in the next 20 years.
Overall, it is clear that the school will accept more student to attend in 2024. More building and car park also will be built in the changing plan.
It is expected that the number of students will grow from 600 to 1000 in the next 20 years. Besides, school building 1 and 2 are going to stay the same location, but they will have the conjunction that goes across the main path. School building 3 is going to replace the old sports field while the new one will be constructed at the southeast of the new road.
The main entrance and the old car park at the west will stay the same old site in 2024 plan. Besides, the new car park is predicted to build at the east side of these buildings. The old road will not be changed in the future while the new road going to be built to connect the new car park with the main entrance.
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. 61
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 67
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 56
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one person households 76
- The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies next year in Turkey. The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of next year. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the same old site in 2024 plan. Besides, the new car park is predicted to build a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.17553191489 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.04816245527 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473404255319 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5348594387 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2222222222 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185169623654 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089685615378 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08063749852 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14659174162 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819876280016 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.96 11.4140731707 61% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.14 8.06136585366 76% => OK
difficult_words: 18.0 40.7170731707 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.