The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of British students at a British university who managed to speak other languages apart from English in 2000 and 2010.
By a glance at the two graphs, we can notice the fact that there was a slight increase in the percentage of multilingual in this school. Besides, the ratio of students who learned Spanish was much more than others in 2000. On the whole, however, the division had not changed much throughout the 10 years.
It appears that approximately three-tenths of the participants chose to not pick up learning any languages except for their mother tongue in both 2000 and 2010. Nevertheless, the rate of Spanish speakers among the scholars decreased by nearly 10 percent between 2000 and 2010. Furthermore, French-speaking students' percentage experienced the same downward trend. On the contrary, bilinguals and trilinguals took up 5% more in each one in 2010 compared to 2000. Surprisingly, there was no fluctuation occurred in the proportion of German users even after a decade.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately Do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately Do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately Do you agree or disagree with this view 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... and 2010. Furthermore, French-speaking students percentage experienced the same downwar...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, nevertheless, apart from, except for, on the contrary, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19047619048 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02727585346 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64880952381 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.317335705 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8888888889 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258469923333 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946094578679 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106989199208 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20013994527 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129229217952 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.