With the advancement of technology and a growing number of people communicating through Internet, the way of face to face communication is dying out. Indeed online communication is playing a significant role in people. This trend is burgeoning and the traditional communication is fading away. This essay utterly agree with this view.
Firstly, the aim of communication is to transmit information. In the past, people have to meet to talk. If two individuals cannot meet due to the sepration of distance, letter is the means of communication. With the advent of telephone, a phone call conveys the subject of discussion. As can be seen, the avenue of communication changed with the development of technology. As long as the purpose of transmitting information is fulfilled, the means of communication do not matter. Besides, technology provides the opportunity to communicate regardless of the distance between the speakers.
Moreover, the invention and development of Internet generates a better alternation of communication than face to face talk. Talking on Internet exceeds the limitation of distance and time. For instance, an American can talk to an Australian wherever and whenever they prefer. With the popularity of Internet and related devices, more and more people use Internet as the main route of communication. According to a research, approximately 80% of the world population access Internet every day. Therefore, it is forseeable that online communication will be the future trend.
To summarize, face to face communication is dying out due to the confinement of time and location. On the contrary, online communication overcomes these drawbacks. In the future, on line communication will become the major trend.
- Modern forms of communication such as email and messaging have reduced the amount of time people spend seeing their friends. This has had a negative effect on their social lives.What extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and includ 67
- TOEFL essay Some people trust their first impressions about a person s character because they believe these judgments are generally correct Other people do not judge a person s character quickly because they believe first impressions are often wrong 39
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task."The table shows the percentage of journeys made by different forms of transport in four countries, The bar graph shows the results of a survey into car use.Summarise the information by selecting and reportin 84
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 63
- The number of overweight children in developed countries is increasing. Some people think this is due to problems such as the growing number of fast food outlets. Others believe that parents are to blame for not looking after their children's health.To wh 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...ace to face communication is dying out. Indeed online communication is playing a signi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, moreover, therefore, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 8.3376753507 348% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47211895911 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39884716871 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53531598513 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.140882447 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.6 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.45 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390051658677 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105995417591 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721089822564 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23970224824 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460137614877 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 41.36 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.85 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.