The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the UK, the rest of Europe and Japan from 1993 to 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line chart provides information about the percentage of people without jobs in the UK, the rest of Europe and Japan between 1993 and 2007.
Overall, there was a decrease in the number of unemployed people in the rest of Europe and the United Kingdom, and the reverse trend was true for Japan. Most notably, the rest of Europe still ranked first in the unemployment rate over the given timeframe despite showing a downward trend. Meanwhile, although Japan fluctuated throughout the period, this figure still ranked last at the end of the period
Looking at the chart in more detail, approximately 11% of the population in the UK was unemployed, the highest figure among all the countries. This was closely followed by the rest of Europe, with its figure standing at around 9%, nearly fourfold to that of Japan, at just 2%.
Following 2 years, the unemployment rate in Japan increased slightly to roughly 5%, after which this figure remained unchanged untill 1999. The rest of Europe saw the same trend as Japan, the figure for Europe rose significantly to nearly 12%, at which point this figure decreased slightly to 10% in 1999. Meanwhile, the opposite trend can be seen in the data for the UK, this figure consistently decreased to 5% in 2001, before staying unchanged untill 2005. In comparison, the jobless rate in Japan rose sharply to 6% in 2003, and reached its highest point, at 6%, which surpassed that of the UK at the same time. In 2007, the jobless rate in Japan declined dramatically to only 4%, while a slight recovery to 6% was recorded in the figure for the UK. In addition, the rest of Europe showed a consistent decrease in the unemployment rate from 1999 to 2007, and finally reaching nearly 8% at the end of the period.
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
- The chart below illustrates the percentages of sales of one bookseller in 1970 1997 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The line chart below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 78
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 100
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od Looking at the chart in more detail, approximately 11% of the population in t...
^^
Line 4, column 528, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate in Japan rose sharply to 6% in 2003, and reached its highest point, at 6%, wh...
^^
Line 4, column 755, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... was recorded in the figure for the UK. In addition, the rest of Europe showed a c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 965.302439024 150% => OK
No of words: 305.0 196.424390244 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74426229508 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57406075423 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488524590164 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.5477949418 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.545454545 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236989439484 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113073676761 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636945224374 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157213316204 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652854208739 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.