You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The charts below show the percentages of men and women aged 60-64 in employment in four countries in 1970 and 2000
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The given diagrams below depict the proportion of male and female aged 60-64 in employment in four regions in the period of 30 years from 1970 to 2000.
Looking from all perspective, it is readily apparent that man whose age from 60-64 have a tendency to engage in work more than woman across all countries. Of all the countries, Japan recorded the largest shares of both male and female workforce entering their early 60s during the entire period.
Concerning the male workforce, in 1970, 76% of male entering thier early 60s still worked, followed by USA and Australia with the figure bening recorded at 55% and 47% correspondingly and Belgium was the country with the least male worker record, at 19%. After 30 years, the figure of all countries witnessed a upward inclination, Japan was still the countries with most male labourer which is recorded at 84% and higher than figure of Australian and USA by 10% and 11% respectively. Belgium observed an impressive plunge to 79%, taking the second position.
In terms of female employee aged 60 and older, Japan was still the leading countries in 1970, it made up 40% of female worker, after which saw a minimal change to 43% in 2000, the highest proportion among all countries. Turning to USA and Australia, the record of both regions had a tendency to fall with the figure being reorded at from 38% to 36% and 19% to 18% respectively. For the Belgium, the country had least proportion of female labourer among all countries with little change from 7% to 8% between 1970 and 2000.
- Some people believe that in a city the best way to travel is by car while other people argue that bicycles are a better way of travelling in a city 73
- Some people think that governments should spend money on providing faster means of public transport Other people think there are more priorities for public transport e g costs environment safety Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 78
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
- Today many people do not know their neighbors Why is this What can be done about this 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Concerning the male workforce, in 1970, 76% of male entering thier early 60s sti...
^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
..., the figure of all countries witnessed a upward inclination, Japan was still the...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79323308271 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55181202032 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522556390977 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.4425611715 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5555555556 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10974504525 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552176564501 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061390758829 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091677812412 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667015030766 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.