The energy use in six fields of Australian household as well as fumes which result from this process.
The charts provide information regarding the energy use in six fields of Australian household as well as fumes which result from this process.
It is obvious that the usage in heating was the highest in comparison with other fields, therefore, the effect of it on the environment was the biggest.
To be specific, the consumption of heating and heating water were 72%, with 42% and 30% for each one while other fields just took modest numbers, such as cooling with only 2%, lighting with 4%. The figure for other appliances was 15%, that took the third place in the total.
In addition, because the Australian used most of the energy to heat, the influence of it on greenhouse gas emissions was the highest, which was nearly a half (at 47%). Moreover, although other appliances and refrigeration just had a tiny number in Australian household energy use, they still exhausted numerous emissions in the air, with 28% and 14% respectively. Besides, cooling and lighting just had little impact on this process, with 3% and 8% respectively.
- Many people work at home using modern technology today. Some people think only workers benefit from this, not the employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Work and family 56
- Many governments think that economic progress is the most important goal. To what extent do you agree with this opinion? 56
- The pie charts below show the membership by percentage of a fitness center in Oslo Norway in 2010 and 2015 67
- Some people claim that not enough the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, third, well, while, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93142857143 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70676250626 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594285714286 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8511484114 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.285714286 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.4285714286 5.23603664747 295% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318349790509 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168309310805 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.259127802681 0.0843802449381 307% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253771979821 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.319112903665 0.0819641961636 389% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.