Essay topics: Line graph : Clothing Export in 1999 - 2003 in Japan, Colombia and Myanmar.
The figure elucidates the number of clothing exports in three different nations from 1999 to 2003. At first glance, it is evident that all countries faced a palpitation over the entire period.
In accordance with Japan and Colombia, 1999 to 2001 witnessed a palpitation in the amount of Japan clothing export. At first, it stood at just beneath 600 millions and it experienced a wave pattern in the next 2 years and finished at 600 millions. Erratically, it fell significantly in the following 2 years where it ended at just less than 500 millions. Furthermore, following the same pattern as Japan, the total of clothing export in Colombia, initially, increased tremendously between 1999, which was at well beyond 400 millions, and 2002, which made up at 700 millions, and suddenly, it dropped considerably in the following years to end at just over 600 millions.
In regard to Myanmar, there was an enormous rise in the amount of clothing export in Myanmar from 1999, which constituted at well under 100 million, through to 2001, which accounted for well across 900 millions, nevertheless, it faced an oscillation over the following 2 years and finished at just across 400 millions in 2003.
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people.Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
- Space exploration requires vast sums of money. Is the amount of money spent on space research justifiable? Could the money be better spent?What is your viewpoint on this issue? Give reasons for your answer. 61
- International travel is becoming cheaper and more and more countries open their door and with more and more tourists Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages 54
- Government should focus spending only on public services, not waste on the arts. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, well, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02010050251 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88290717137 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532663316583 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.2288937898 43.030603864 224% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 142.714285714 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199368204051 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116589139436 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118246324889 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1463454763 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0030298494415 0.0819641961636 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.