Line graph : Clothing Export in 1999 - 2003 in Japan, Colombia and Myanmar.
The figure elucidates the number of clothing exports in three different nations from 1999 to 2003. At first glance, it is evident that all countries faced a palpitation over the entire period.
To begin with Japan and Colombia, the number of clothing export in Japan experienced a gradual palpitation in between 1999, which was at well less 600 millions, and 2001, which made up at 600 millions, erratically, it plunged, declining to just less than 500 millions by the end of the period shown. Furthermore, 1999 to 2002 witnessed a tremendous upsurge in the amount of clothing export in Colombia in which it, approximately, increased dramatically at around 250 millions. Nevertheless, it dropped considerably in the next year to end at just over 600 millions.
In accordance with Myanmar, there was enormous progress in the total of clothing export in Myanmar from 1999, which constituted at well under 100 million, through to 2001, which accounted for well across 900 millions, however, it faced a high oscillation over the following 2 years and achieved at just across 400 millions in 2003.
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 61
- The maps show the changes of Springfield primary school in 2005 2015 87
- Topic: technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree with this statement? 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 56
- Some people believe that computers are more a hindrance than a help in today's world. Others feel that they are such indispensable tools that they would not be able to live or work without them.In what ways are computers a hindrance?What is your opin 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10555555556 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91197506264 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572222222222 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.7754423137 43.030603864 232% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 153.166666667 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256803529254 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130437695615 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964180080647 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175832028062 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0092121800027 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.