Essay topics: The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

Essay topics: The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The maps illustrate the route how to get to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010. it shows the visitors and staffs a parking space and where to get the bus off.

Some points have remained almost similarly since 2007. The ring road has surrounded the city hospital and the hospital road has connected to the city road. And there has been a car park between the ring road and the hospital road since 2007.

On the contrary, there are several differences between the map of 2007 and 2010. two roundabouts have constructed on the each part of the hospital road in 2010. To compare the bus stops in 2007, a huge bus station which accommodate all the buses to the hospital road connects those two roundabouts. The extra car park has also opened to separate the users into who commute and visit the facility. it would ease the inconvenience caused by the concentrated vehicles at one parking lot.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-16 Loi Chau 73 view
2020-01-16 Loi Chau 73 view
2020-01-16 Loi Chau 61 view
2020-01-06 wardiati 11 view
2020-01-06 snowsss 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...et to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010. it shows the visitors and staffs a parking...
^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Two
...ences between the map of 2007 and 2010. two roundabouts have constructed on the eac...
^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
... also opened to separate the users into who commute and visit the facility. it woul...
^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...nto who commute and visit the facility. it would ease the inconvenience caused by ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 741.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66037735849 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47653438866 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540880503145 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.3823453018 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.1 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275687173958 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114344944699 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797160281048 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193446905977 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192815712633 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.66 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.