The charts illustrate the proportion of four types of food, namely processed food, vegetables and fruits, animal food and nuts and seeds, was consumed in the world, compared with the figures for China and India, in the year 2008.
Overall, consumers all over the world consumed more processed food than other kinds of food. In addition, people India and other countries ate the least nuts and seeds while Chinese ate the least animal food.
Totally, 41% of processed food was consumed by global citizens, more specifically, 34% in China and 39% in India. These numbers were followed by the figures for vegetable and fruits, with 29% in the world, 32% in China and 23% in India.
People in the world spent their money on 26% animal food, compared with 27% in India and just 15% in China. In contrast, while up to 19% of nuts and seeds were spent in China, the percentages was just at 11% and 4% for India and others respectively.
- Some people say that in the modern world it is very difficult for people to have a healthy lifestyle Others however say that it is easy for people to be healthy and fit if they want to be Discuss both these views and give your opinion Give reasons for y 95
- Development in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opini 89
- The chart gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries india and China. Write a report to university lecture and describe the data. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 768.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68292682927 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34193973814 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518292682927 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1924647494 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.714285714 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235402034099 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121220192419 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564436129976 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160175309959 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429224488006 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.