Fire plan for the second floor
The map illustrates an evacuation plan in case of fire emergency for the second floor with seven bedrooms.
It is noticeable that although this house is equipped with a lift, residents are not allowed to use it but follow escape routes in case of fire.
The plan works on the ideas that people must run to the nearest stairs to run down and gather at meeting spots if a fire occurs. The shortest and fastest escape way for residents living three rooms (1, 2 and 3), which are in the left-hand side of the floor is the stairs at the bottom left-hand corner. After descending these stairs, people are supposed to meet at the first meeting point which is immediately on the right.
On the other side of the floor, there are also another stairs between the 7th room (in the top right corner) and the lift. The stairs are considered to be the quickest escape routes for those who live in rooms 4 to 7 and those who are about to use the lift when a fire accident happens. People will present at the meeting place 2 after running down these stairs.
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development overweight the disadvantages? 84
- the diagrams below show existing and proposed floor plan for the redevelopment of an art gallery. 73
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits andvegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39378238342 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22865395255 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559585492228 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0471061381 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271728059281 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116480940431 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139936320697 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195010500551 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160168942509 0.0819641961636 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.