The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
These graphs show the sports monthly spending and the different sports that British children are able to choose between 2008 to 2014. This divided into 2 different line graphs. Overall, the trend of annual spending for children sports risen and the favorable spot over 6 years was football.
In 2008, parents only spend 20 pounds every month to make their children became healthy. But, in the next few years, they needed to pay more on children’s sports until it reached a peak in 2014. It accounted for more than 30 pounds at the end of 2014.
The children also had several alternatives for them to did sport. There was football, swimming, and athletics. Since 2008, football became the best sport that children choose compared to the other 2 sports. In the next 2 years, football demand slightly reduced while swimming rate still grew and an athletics started to increase. Between 2010 to 2012, athletics took a big change and had the same amount of children with swimming. In the next year, athletics numbers reached 5 million of children and beated the amount of swimming. In the end, athletics still had more amount of children that participated. However, swimming could maintain the number and reached more than 2.5 million participations in 2014.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02843601896 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53937346617 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582938388626 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.50111315 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7857142857 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0714285714 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272338790021 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093296636477 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740294630761 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19265697995 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313828790402 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.