The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.

Essay topics:

The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.

The provided graphs illustrates about how much money that British parents spent on their offspring’s sports in pounds from 2008 to 2014 and the number of participants (in millions) in football, athletics and swimming during the time above.
It is evident from the line charts that parents spent much more money to focus their children on sports and the number of children participating in football was the highest during the whole time scale.
In details, the money spent on children’s sports by their parents jumped from 20 in 2008 to nearly 33 at the end of the period time, which increased by roughly 4 pounds every two years.
Participants in three different kinds of sports experienced an upward trend. The highest number belonged to children attending to football with just nearly 8 in the beginning time which decrease slightly before reaching peak at around 9 in 2014. In term of athletics that has only 1 million compared to just under 2.5 of swimming in 2008, which overcame the children in swimming in 2011 and peaked at higher point about 5 in 2014 while the figure for anther was 3.5.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-03 cindycornelia98 67 view
2019-11-09 marin123 73 view
2019-11-04 pritam 67 view
2019-10-06 skelly 73 view
2019-10-05 rohitbangari27@gmail.com 67 view
Essays by user No name :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unds from 2008 to 2014 and the number of participants in millions in football, at...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d by roughly 4 pounds every two years. Participants in three different kinds of...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89417989418 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67054811162 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.2541078228 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.166666667 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399157624102 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198853648069 0.103423049105 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969914318379 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260901017132 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616106176639 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.