The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period

Essay topics:

The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period

The line graphs illustrate the spending pattern per month of parents in Britain on their children's sporting activities and the number of children who took part in three different sports from 2008 to 2014.

Overall, it is evident that parents dedicated more money EACH YEAR to their children’s participation in sports over the six-year period. In terms of children taking part, football was more significantly higher than the other two activities, swimming and athletics.

In 2008, 20.5 pounds were spent on children participating in sporting events every month. This number then witnessed a gradual increase over the following years before reaching just over 30 pounds at the end of the period.

Looking at the participation numbers, in 2008 approximately 8 million British children played football, compared with only 2 and less than 1 million children in the statistics for Athletics and Swimming respectively. Still, there was a stable increase in the figure for football throughout the stage. By contrast, participation in swimming almost doubled to nearly 4 million children, yet was overtaken by athletics, which increased fivefold in 2008.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-17 myduyen282 78 view
Essays by user kookoomimi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...porting events every month. This number then witnessed a gradual increase over the f...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, still, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49162011173 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95311511139 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664804469274 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7206607733 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.875 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344391672443 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145030050291 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107670369534 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215205710456 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788454256087 0.0819641961636 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.