The two pie charts delineate the proportion of different power used and the levels of emission of greenhouse gas in Australian families.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is obvious that the majority of power used in Australia was heating, and the emission which was emitted into the atmosphere the most was water heating.
As is presented in the first pie chart, it can be seen that the highest amount of energy used in Australia was heating, took up 42%, almost was three times higher than other appliances and was one-half in comparison to water heating. In addition, Australian household who used energy for cooling, lighting, and refrigeration were in the minority, registering 2%, 4%, and 7% respectively.
As for the rate of emission of greenhouse gas which was used in Australia, we can see that the figure for water heating and other appliances occupied roughly one-third of the total. Following that, the percentage of greenhouse gas which was emitted into the atmosphere for heating and refrigeration was halved lower than the two aforementioned purposes. Finally, the record for the cooling and light were lowest rate, accounting for 3% and 8% in turn.
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- People who do not use social media networks will always fall behind in career development opportunities To what extent do you feel that this is an accurate and important prediction 84
- The maps below shows the development of a particular area from 1965 to present day 78
- The graph below gives information abouth the percentage of population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 10
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 400, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the lowest'.
Suggestion: were the lowest
...y, the record for the cooling and light were lowest rate, accounting for 3% and 8% in turn....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, so, third, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09844559585 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88319506222 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528497409326 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.989284279 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.571428571 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195675127817 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10352628867 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621987217162 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139501986392 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515185558386 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 400, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the lowest'.
Suggestion: were the lowest
...y, the record for the cooling and light were lowest rate, accounting for 3% and 8% in turn....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, so, third, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09844559585 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88319506222 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528497409326 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.989284279 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.571428571 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195675127817 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10352628867 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621987217162 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139501986392 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515185558386 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.