Table The price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia

The table chart delineates the expenditure on a cup o coffee in different countries in Australia in the years 2010 and 2014.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is obvious that the amount of money that individuals in Sydney spend on a cup of coffee was remarkably higher than in other cities at any time of period. Moreover, the figure for all cities had a tendency to increase, except for Brisbane.
As is presented in the table, we can see that the majority of expenses on a cup of coffee was in Sydney, and it increased noticeably from $2.9 to $3.17 within four years. With regards to Melbourne, despite the second-ranked in the price of each coffee cup, it witnessed the strongest growth by approximately one-fourth. In contrast, the data for Brisbane remained unchanged throughout the period shown.
Furthermore, it is can be seen that the residents in Perth city spent on a cup of coffee, jumped moderately from $2.1 to $2.25. As for Adelaide city, the price of a cup of coffee ranked penultimate in comparison to other cities, its figure noticed a remarkable rise by 6.95%. A similar trend was witnessed in the amount of money that people in Canberra city, although the data ranked last all of the time, it still went up gradually from $1.5 to $1.7 within 4 years.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rra city, although the data ranked last all of the time, it still went up gradually from ....
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, as for, except for, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66964285714 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80463753615 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6438803578 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.222222222 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346266329554 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12914965102 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103696025552 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217862940398 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944180188379 0.0819641961636 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rra city, although the data ranked last all of the time, it still went up gradually from ....
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, as for, except for, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66964285714 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80463753615 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6438803578 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.222222222 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346266329554 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12914965102 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103696025552 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217862940398 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944180188379 0.0819641961636 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.