There is a suggestion that youngsters who are preparing for their university should take a gap year to do some work or go someplace. In my opinion, the disadvantages of this phenomenon far outweigh the advantages in equal measure.
The first drawback of this trend is that students who spend one year on other activities are wasting their valuable duration. This means that the time when they’re preparing for their university is the best time and the most suitable time for them to concentrate on their study, if they leaf their studies, even just a year, it would be hard to come back to their study. A further argument is that they would not graduate on time if they took a gap year, and leading to following their peers, who are the same age.
Despite the negatives mentioned above, it seems to me that spending a year to do something else is a negative development. Firstly, these students could undergo some part-time jobs or visit some scenery places to enhance their social knowledge and open their mind. For example, if they applied for university instantly, they would not have an opportunity to connect with the outside environment, leading to a lack of social knowledge. Furthermore, some students who are from lower-income families have to effort to earn money in order to cover the tuition fee. In many university institutions, the high teaching quality and modern facilities always required high tuition, hence, to gain an education with better quality, they have to work before becoming the first year student.
In conclusion, students should make a decision to decide whether to take a gap year or continue to apply for college activities that rely on their situation.
- The map shows the changes to a residence hall between 2010 and the present 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94035087719 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72789811608 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.9519599322 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203235740916 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854177307367 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480916703065 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143699538001 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582873823335 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.