The first line graph shows the average monthly spending on children’s sports by their parents from 2008 to 2014 while the second one presents the amount of children participating in football, athletics and swimming in the UK at the same time.
It is clear from the first graph that the money which parents spent for their kids went up rapidly through every year. As the same pattern, there were more and more children joined in three kinds of sport, especially the growth rate of young athletes was the fastest.
In 2008, British parents spent 20 pounds per month on their children’s activities. It climbed to 25 pounds per month in 2010 and kept going then reached approximate 28 pounds by 2012. Finally, it ended up with at the highest level about 33 pounds a month in 2014.
Graph 2 shows that the participation of children in football was around 7.6 million in 2008, which remained constant till 2010 with a slight increase in 2012 of around 8 million and remained constant till 2014. On the other hand, the Athletics were the lowest of around 1 million, which remained similar in number in 2010 and eventually inclined to 5 million in 2012 with a slight decline of around 4.8 million in 2014. Whereas, participants in swimming in 2008 were around 2.4 million, which rose steadily to 2.5 and around 2.8 million in 2010 and 2012 respectively and reached the peak of 4 million in 2014.
The first line graph shows the average monthly spending on children’s sports by their parents from 2008 to 2014 while the second one presents the amount of children participating in football, athletics and swimming in the UK at the same time.
It is clear from the first graph that the money which parents spent for their kids went up rapidly through every year. As the same pattern, there were more and more children joined in three kinds of sport, especially the growth rate of young athletes was the fastest.
In 2008, British parents spent 20 pounds per month on their children’s activities. It climbed to 25 pounds per month in 2010 and kept going then reached approximate 28 pounds by 2012. Finally, it ended up with at the highest level about 33 pounds a month in 2014.
Graph 2 shows that the participation of children in football was around 7.6 million in 2008, which remained constant till 2010 with a slight increase in 2012 of around 8 million and remained constant till 2014. On the other hand, the Athletics were the lowest of around 1 million, which remained similar in number in 2010 and eventually inclined to 5 million in 2012 with a slight decline of around 4.8 million in 2014. Whereas, participants in swimming in 2008 were around 2.4 million, which rose steadily to 2.5 and around 2.8 million in 2010 and 2012 respectively and reached the peak of 4 million in 2014.
- The line chart above shows changes in the average money spent every month on children’s sports by parents from 2008 to 2010. The following graph compares the number of children taking part in three different physical activities, which are football, athl 73
- The pie charts above depict the median ages of Yemeni and Italian citizens in 2000 and predictions in 2050.It is well-defined from the charts that kids, teenagers and adults under 60 years old account for most of Yemen’s population both in 2000 and 2050 73
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 78
- The line chart above gives information on the figure for British city workers travelling every day to work by the three common kinds of transport from 1970 to 2030.It is clear from the graph that the quickly rising number of people who went and will go to 73
- The line chart above gives information on the figure for British city workers travelling every day to work with the three common kinds of transport from 1970 to 2030.It is clear from the graph that the quickly rising number of people who want and will go 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, second, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76229508197 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57203397616 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.6329381132 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.111111111 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423688998079 0.215688989381 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194894530232 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.270063392825 0.0843802449381 320% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.34444830957 0.15604864568 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.346744569908 0.0819641961636 423% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.