The following charts represent the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given bar charts reflecting the weight evaluation of inhabitants between yeas of 1955 and 2015 in Charleston city among the differing age groups. It seems that this period of time has seen incredible changes in this town.
It is evident that based on the provided information from bar chart, in 1955 the most percentage of ideal weight among the individuals is related to range of 20 to 29 approximately by 70%. Moreover, the less percentage of underweight is associated with people aged from 40 to 49 years. While the youngest group experienced the lowest overweight at less than 5% comparing with other sections, inhabitants who aged from 50-59 dedicated the most percentage of obese guys by 10%.
In contrast, this trend is completely different in 2015 compared with 1955. By supplied date from the second chart it is fully clear that the most number of ideal-weight people was remained to younger group by 70%, however it is tangible that the rate of overweight and obesity has slightly increased by 6 and 3%, respectively. Moreover, the chart reveals that highest ratio of obesity among various categories is involved to 60-69 years old and it follows by other older groups respectively. Surprisingly, the percentage of ideal weight has fallen dramatically by less than 5%. Nonetheless, the rate of ideal weight stayed unchanged for others.
Consequently, If I want to surmise these bar charts, I would argue that the percentage of oldest people as well as 50-59 years old who suffer from obesity sharply has grown between the period of 1955 and 2015 from 5% to 60% and 10% to over 50%. Additionally, all age ranges have experienced the decreases in underweight relatively except youngest range stabilized during this interval of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-12 | farzad.rahmati_1989 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 78
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staffs at all times, even on holidays.Does this development have more advantage than disadvantages? 89
- Describe provided map which illustrating what changes have happened in Foton and Meadowside. 67
- The bar chart shows the number of overseas students enrolled in a third year Computer Science course at a Canadian college.Summarize the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- In the world the majority of people waste considerable food everyday.Explain why this is happening and give solutions for this problem. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...iffering age groups. It seems that this period of time has seen incredible changes in this tow...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the oldest'.
Suggestion: of the oldest
...arts, I would argue that the percentage of oldest people as well as 50-59 years old who s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'except the youngest'.
Suggestion: except the youngest
...the decreases in underweight relatively except youngest range stabilized during this interval o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tabilized during this interval of time.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 287.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06620209059 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88267254772 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 106.607317073 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543554006969 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.681248276 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.166666667 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12940256286 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520775492284 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396118516252 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837210450203 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272800509981 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.