The following table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the standard of living reflected through four indicators in five nations in 1980.
It is noticeable that the quality of life in USA overtook the other four countries by a wide margin.
According to data, USA had the best quaity of life with the highest GNP at 13,160 dollars per head. It also had a much higher daily calorie intake and life expectancy, and the lowest rate of infant mortality. There were a lower quality of life in Egypt, Indonesia and Bolivia which sharing comparable figures in four main indicators. Egypt citizens were provided the highest GNP with 690 dollars per head, while the infant mortality rate of Bolivia was the highest among st the three.
Bangladesh citizens were supplied with the worst quality of life in all the indicators. Its GNP was one hundred times smaller than the USA’s, meanwhile, its infant mortality rate was 10 times greater.
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15 56
- More and more students are choosing to study at colleges and universities in foreign countries Do the benefits of studying abroad outweigh the drawbacks 73
- The following table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 747.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91447368421 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48763388955 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598684210526 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.0688786315 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.375 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105062538126 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541144242517 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424396058115 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739625280811 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295597669238 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.