The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various
leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
Glance at two pie charts provided reveals that European adults have many similarities and differences in their leisure activities in 1985 and in 1995.
It is noticeable that playing computer games was most popular leisure activity among European adults in 1995 meanwhile it wasn't any respondent in 1985.Eating out which was don't any respondent in 1985 ,also climb up to 8 percent in 1995 .
In stark contrast ,however, watching TV decreased only 2 percent and reach from 32 percent to 30 percent. Talk with family and talk with friend respectively reach to 21 and 32 percent after a decade.
- The charts below shaw the proportions of the world's oil resources held in different areas, together with the proportions consumed annually in the samc arcas. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison 61
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women ofdifferent ages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the Britishprison system.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featu 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Austrailan men and women In dlffcrent age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of variousleisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 22
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of variousleisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ng European adults in 1995 meanwhile it wasnt any respondent in 1985.Eating out which...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Eating
...anwhile it wasnt any respondent in 1985.Eating out which was dont any respondent in 19...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...respondent in 1985.Eating out which was dont any respondent in 1985 ,also climb up t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ut which was dont any respondent in 1985 ,also climb up to 8 percent in 1995 . In...
^^
Line 2, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...1985 ,also climb up to 8 percent in 1995 . In stark contrast ,however, watching T...
^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o 8 percent in 1995 . In stark contrast ,however, watching TV decreased only 2 pe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 495.0 965.302439024 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 99.0 196.424390244 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.15434214553 3.73543355544 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74187891782 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 70.0 106.607317073 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.707070707071 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 140.4 283.868780488 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5392562738 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180975271592 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100605791227 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103485738565 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13414105497 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988969587903 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.