The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of variousleisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various
leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.

Glance at two pie charts provided reveals that European adults have many similarities and differences in their leisure activities in 1985 and in 1995.
Despite many changes in rate of leisure activities in each year watching TV also was most popular leisure activity in each of two years. It is noticeable that playing computer games was most popular leisure activity among European adults in 1995 meanwhile it wasn't any respondent in 1985.Eating out which was don't any respondent in 1985 ,also climb up to 8 percent in 1995 .
In stark contrast ,however, watching TV decreased only 2 percent and reach from 32 percent to 30 percent.Talk with family and talk with friend respectively reach to 7 and 26 percent after a decade .However talk with friends grow up a mere 8 percent , talk with family fall up and reach in somewhere in vicinity of 7 percent in 1995.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-01-05 SaeidAp 56 view
2019-01-05 SaeidAp 22 view
Essays by user SaeidAp :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 259, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ng European adults in 1995 meanwhile it wasnt any respondent in 1985.Eating out which...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Eating
...anwhile it wasnt any respondent in 1985.Eating out which was dont any respondent in 19...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...respondent in 1985.Eating out which was dont any respondent in 1985 ,also climb up t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ut which was dont any respondent in 1985 ,also climb up to 8 percent in 1995 . In...
^^
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...1985 ,also climb up to 8 percent in 1995 . In stark contrast ,however, watching T...
^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o 8 percent in 1995 . In stark contrast ,however, watching TV decreased only 2 pe...
^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Talk
...and reach from 32 percent to 30 percent.Talk with family and talk with friend respec...
^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...reach to 7 and 26 percent after a decade .However talk with friends grow up a mere...
^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...ach to 7 and 26 percent after a decade .However talk with friends grow up a mere 8 perc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ach to 7 and 26 percent after a decade .However talk with friends grow up a mere 8 perc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lk with friends grow up a mere 8 percent , talk with family fall up and reach in s...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 713.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81756756757 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70036211563 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587837837838 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.4741199377 43.030603864 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.25 112.824112599 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 22.9334400587 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161729868474 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125285686383 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844754080551 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138241314299 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947581091653 0.0819641961636 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.