The GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.
The bar charts given below describe the percentage of comparison GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. Overall, it can be seen that Tunisia was the most positive trend in 2007, while in 2010 the most popular country was Japan.
In 2007, Tunisia was the largest value, it had represented more over of a half than other country. However, the biggest value in 2010 was Japan, it had moved significantly three years later. In contrast, Tunisia had fallen slightly during three years later. Then, Ecuador had fluctuated from year to year.
Finally, all of countries had changed for three years later. In 2010, Tunisia had the hugest percentage in 2007, it had value about 6.3%, in the next year Ecuador was the most popular country, it had around 4.9%. In 2009, Japan had grown was the hugest percentage at about 5.2%. then, in the last year Japan was the most positive trend of other country, it had about 6.5%.
- Average household expenditures by major catagory 56
- Comparison of different kind of energy production of France in two years 73
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies.Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decided to do this. 61
- US Spending Patterns between 1966 and 1996 56
- The comparison proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three diets 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
...as the hugest percentage at about 5.2%. then, in the last year Japan was the most po...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76687116564 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2229255205 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521472392638 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8730293508 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340458538334 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16432795341 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175518594011 0.0843802449381 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277286501513 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155871108839 0.0819641961636 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.