The given charts give information about the number of students at university in the UK from 1991 to 2001, government spending and the types of family economic background they came from in 1991
The bar chart illustrates the number of students who study at university in the UK and the pie chart shows the percentage of students family's income in 1991 and the line chart describes the amount of money that governments spend on each student from 1991 to 2001.
Overall, the middle income family had the largest percentage and there was a fall of funded money for each student by the government and the total number of people who study at university in the UK increased gradually.
First of all, in 1991, the total number of pupils studied at university in the UK was about 1000000 people then rose slightly to over 15000000 people in the next 6 years. Secondly, this figure reached a peak at over 2000000 people in 1991 before reducing to 2000000 students in 2001.
Thirdly, unlike the total number of students, there was a huge change in the amount of money that governments spend on each student in the UK university, which decreased dramatically from 6500 pounds to under 5000 pounds in 1996 then remained this number to 2001. In addition, according to the pie chart, the proportion of family income in each student, which had the largest percentage was the middle income about 62%. The second family economic background in the UK university was the high income, which took 32% while 8% left was the low income.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-24 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | buiminhduc | 82 | view |
| 2021-10-15 | minhquanvn | 73 | view |
- the charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010
- Online shopping is replacing conventional shopping stores Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age groups used to get daily news in one country in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the chart show that time spent on two devices according to various categories Describe the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that international sporting events are the ideal opportunity to show the world the qualities of the hosting nation Others believe that these events are mainly a large unjustifiable expense 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, secondly, then, third, thirdly, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75652173913 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47613944289 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460869565217 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.236352085 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.285714286 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8571428571 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387274935907 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18424487207 0.103423049105 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109182570289 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255295667438 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111481438859 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.