the given graph show the consumption of fast food in the UK ( per week) from 1970 to 1990
The line graph compare how many grams food were bought using from three types of fast food in per week from 1970 to 1990.
Overall, there was a decrease of pizza over a period shown while both Fish and Chips and Hamburger had an up wart trend in each year.
By the year 1970, the number of pizza was highest bought over 300 grams weekly and the number of hamburger was lowest around 30 grams. Meanwhile, approximately 80 grams Fish and chips were eaten in UK. In 1985, consumed of pizza went down and reached a bottom of 200 grams whereas other figures rise gradually.
In 1990, consumption Fish and Chips reach peaked at 500 grams per week and highest all of three fast foods, hamburger also increased approximately 300 grams weekly. The number of pizza consumed remained stable about 200 grams.
- the line graph gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 56
- the line graph gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 56
- People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 77
- using modern connect are useful now aday. agree and disagree 84
- the given graph show the consumption of fast food in the UK ( per week) from 1970 to 1990 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'grams'' or 'gram's'?
Suggestion: grams'; gram's
The line graph compare how many grams food were bought using from three types...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the lowest'.
Suggestion: was the lowest
...rams weekly and the number of hamburger was lowest around 30 grams. Meanwhile, approximate...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 660.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64788732394 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22075653135 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605633802817 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 181.8 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7269230378 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2857142857 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238195825139 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103157402151 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145753930696 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16131663942 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164694792614 0.0819641961636 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.