The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990.
The line graph shows the amount of fast-food consumption per week by UK citizens between two years 1970 - 1990.
It is clear that the amount of hamburgers, fish and chips consumed in the UK increased over the period shown, but the opposite was true for the figures for pizza. In addition, the proportion of fish and chips was highest.
In 1970, the amount of pizza consumed was the highest, at 300 grams per week, while the figure for pizza, fish and chips was significantly lower at nearly 50 grams and below 100 grams respectively
In 1990, the amount of fish and chips consumed in the UK increased rapidly by over 200 grams to over 300 grams per person per week and become the highest figure in the chart. There was a dramatic decrease to around 200 grams in the figure for pizza. The consumption of hamburgers experienced rapidly increased to nearly 300 grams.
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 61
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are causes And what will be effected on society 86
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and giv 56
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s and below 100 grams respectively In 1990, the amount of fish and chips cons...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 726.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74509803922 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46671209876 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496732026144 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 109.260773687 43.030603864 254% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230876076992 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132949456372 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.201978196853 0.0843802449381 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201845796106 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.217397791621 0.0819641961636 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.