The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990.

The graph illustrates the amount of weekly consumption of three different types of fast food in the UK over a period of 20 years starting from 1970.
It is clear that while the amount of Hamburger and Fish & Chips consumed weekly increased over the period, the opposite was true for Pizza. It is also noticeable that Fish & Chips was by far the most popular fast food in the UK over the period shown.
In 1970, Pizza had the highest figure for the number of weekly consumption, at 300 grams, compared to 100grams in the amount of Hamburger and Fish & Chip eaten by British per week. Over the next 15 years, there was a dramatic increase in the figure for Hamburgers and Fish & Chips consumption at 300 grams and over 100 grams respectively. In contrast, British eating Pizza per week deceased significantly to hit a lowest point of 200 grams during the same period.
In 1990, Fish & Chips went up substantially and became the most popular fast food in UK per week at 500grams, while the weekly hamburger consumption witnessed a slight raise to nearly 300 grams. At the same time, the figure for Pizza remained stable at around 200 grams.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... per week deceased significantly to hit a lowest point of 200 grams during the sa...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.705 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54230125228 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7856029012 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.625 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276456132259 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135654618598 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12533855959 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204340810779 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109712023405 0.0819641961636 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.