The given graphs illustrate the figure for market share and trade of top 6 PCs vendors around the world in 2018.
We can see that market share was directly proportional with trade of brands technology. On the other hand, Lenovo has the highest percentages in the chart.
The data for Lenovo reached a peak of 23% in market share then the quantity of Lenovo in trade was the highest to 5846 million PCs sold. The proportion of market share of HP was 22%, 1 % less than the percentage of that of Lenovo, thus the amount for trade of HP was 5633 million PCs sold. The proportion of market share of Dell was 16% while that of HP stood at 22% and the volume of trade of Dell was 4191 million PCs sold.
The percentage of market share of Asus, Acer, Apple was the low. Asus and Acer’s figure had the similar to 6%, therefore the quanity of trade of that was 1572 and 1553 million respectively. The statics for market share of Apple was 7%, 1% more than the data for that Asus, the number of trade of Apple stood at 1801 million while that of Asus was 1553 million of PCs sold.
The given graphs illustrate the figure for market share and trade of top 6 PCs vendors around the world in 2018.
We can see that market share was directly proportional with trade of brands technology. On the other hand, Lenovo has the highest percentages in the chart.
The data for Lenovo reached a peak of 23% in market share then the quantity of Lenovo in trade was the highest to 5846 million PCs sold. The proportion of market share of HP was 22%, 1 % less than the percentage of that of Lenovo, thus the amount for trade of HP was 5633 million PCs sold. The proportion of market share of Dell was 16% while that of HP stood at 22% and the volume of trade of Dell was 4191 million PCs sold.
The percentage of market share of Asus, Acer, Apple was the low. Asus and Acer’s figure had the similar to 6%, therefore the quanity of trade of that was 1572 and 1553 million respectively. The statics for market share of Apple was 7%, 1% more than the data for that Asus, the number of trade of Apple stood at 1801 million while that of Asus was 1553 million of PCs sold.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-28 | bichnguyen | 67 | view |
- The given pie graph illustrates figure s arrestee by gender in the US in 2010 It is clear that we can see a correlation that the rate of female guilty more than male in group about violence against the person and theft In contrast the percentage of crime 61
- The countries arranged international sports event with many benifical purpose However The nation had face to face social proplems from sport events 84
- The given graphs illustrate the figure for market share and trade of top 6 PCs vendors around the world in 2018 We can see that market share was directly proportional with trade of brands technology On the other hand Lenovo has the highest percentages in 67
- The given pie graph illustrates the rate of people of fitness center is Oslo Norway in 2010 and 2015 Overall the proportion of membership taking part in a fitness center had changed between 2010 and 2015 On the other hand the young people had growth up pe 61
- The given line graph illustrates the figure of clients in some restaurants in Vietnam in 2019 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... trade of HP was 5633 million PCs sold. The proportion of market share of Dell was ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ade of Dell was 4191 million PCs sold. The percentage of market share of Asus, Ace...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, therefore, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.30541871921 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16675538812 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433497536946 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1825659399 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1111111111 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.586769784476 0.215688989381 272% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.301642169243 0.103423049105 292% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162554442368 0.0843802449381 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.455877648377 0.15604864568 292% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.173796135909 0.0819641961636 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.