The line graph illustrates how much money yearly American spending on mobile phone, domestic and oversea landline services from 2001 to 2010.
The initial impression from graph is that the amount of money which costumer spending on mobile phone and worldwide fixed-line services were increased in the final year. In contrast, consumer expenditure on domestic landline services is the lowest, it decreased significantly in 2010.
Starting at about $700, the national services got the highest value, following by worldwide with about $250 and the smallest is mobile phone at $200 in 2001. However, there was a significant decline to $600 in the amount of money of domestic landline services in the year 2003. Meanwhile, the expenditure on cell phone and oversea fixed-line services growth considerably by more than $300.
After climbing from 2001 to 2003, the amount of money Americans spend on mobile phone fixed-line services continued to bounce sharply to more than $700 and hit the highest level in the last year. In addition, the spending on domestic landline services continued to plunge to $400 and reached the second level. Moreover, worldwide fixed-line services remain stabled and touch the lowest point at around $300.
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 84
- Some people say that we do not need printed paper newspapers Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24102564103 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68824602049 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502564102564 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.557777697 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.555555556 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313441199027 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154572920276 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972142011072 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244363461868 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620660261295 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.