The given map gives information on two potential positions (S1 and S2) of a supermarket that will be built in a town called Garlsdon.
The given map gives information on two potential positions (S1 and S2) of a supermarket that will be built in a town called Garlsdon.
A quick glance at the supplied map reveals that while S1 in the outskirt of the town, S2 is located in the center. It is also obvious that S1 could be accessed by both railway and main road whereas the only way to approach S2 is by railway.
As can be seen from the map, the situation of S1 covers a small area in suburb which is far from Hindon residential area about 12 kilometers toward the northwest. In stark contrast, S2 is placed in the center of town which is surrounded by industry park and housing zone. Besides, the location of S2 is quite near Bransdon town and Cransdon town, the distance is 16 kilometers to the Southwest and 25 kilometers to the Southeast, respectively.
On the other hand, it is evident that the situation of S2 would be reached by only railroad. However, S1 is arranged in the area that can be moved closer by both types of transport: main road and railway.
- There are a lot of people tending to move from countryside to urban areas due to a higher standard of life 84
- Given are one table and two pie charts. The table provides data of the sum of tourists to Ashdown museum while two charts demonstrate the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visits, during the same periods. 78
- Two provided charts demonstrate the distance of route on a monthly basis and the allocation of mean of transportation used by Britain inhabitants during the period from 1990 to 2010. 89
- What should children do after graduating? 56
- A horizontal city or a vertical city 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50264550265 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62631134253 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4742517064 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452472382692 0.215688989381 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208836849209 0.103423049105 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.30021438695 0.0843802449381 356% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.356621865746 0.15604864568 229% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.372202923273 0.0819641961636 454% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.