Grange park in 1920and today.
The two plans illustrate the changes of grange park from 1920 to and present today. This public park was inaugurated in 1920.
Overall, there are multiple modifications done on the infrastructure of the park over the years mainly on the rose garden and allocated seats.
Over to the first plan, the main attractions of the park was the fountain at the centre and the stage for musicians near the east side. Along with that, in the northwest region, there was a pond for water plants. Similarly, rose gardens located all the three corners of the plan and the arrangements of seats were also distributed at different areas of the map. Moreover, there was a glasshouse near the entrance from Eldon Street.
However, after the renovations grange park structure has been changed a lot. Significantly, the fountain is replaced by rose garden and seats arranged on all four sides of the garden. Likewise, stage for musician modified to an amphitheatre for concerts and expand the stadium up to the east end of the plan. Furthermore childrens play area and beautiful water feature created in the place of old pond and glass house respectively. In addition, today there is anew underground parking area built in one end of the Eldon street entrance
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-11 | fmichela | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-31 | Amarpreet Singh | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-04 | Yakubova Shakhlo | view | |
| 2021-12-02 | eyraen | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | vishu vishali | 78 | view |
- In schools and universities girls tend to choose arts while boys like science What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed 77
- The diagram below shows how the solar powered water pump work Summarise the information and selecting the features
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 77
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'renovations'' or 'renovation's'?
Suggestion: renovations'; renovation's
...from Eldon Street. However, after the renovations grange park structure has been changed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 310, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...stadium up to the east end of the plan. Furthermore childrens play area and beautiful wate...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ermore childrens play area and beautiful water feature created in the place of ol...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, similarly, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91904761905 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72770700177 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590476190476 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9761195617 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0833333333 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199648004806 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808385610674 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102585300218 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143479583066 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105018032966 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.