Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time. This can benefit teenagers and the community as well. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is to be discussed with some that youngsters could do some social works into the community for the betterment of society and themselves. However, This essay agrees with the statement because it would enhance the social commitment and skills of the children.
Young generations are the counterpart of national development and the upcoming future. Knowledge about social needs and services would enhance them to arrange a programme and commit fruitful proposals for the advancement of the country. Children who work inside the community and are involved with the common people would enlarge their ability to accept and understand the basic issues of everyone. Similarly, community works arranged with the gangs and social groups of teenagers may mitigate not only the distance to the local community but also develop interpersonal relationships with each other. For example, teenage groups who arranged a plastic-free town in the local municipality in India got felicitated from the prime minister office recently. Moreover, engagement with this kind of social works would alleviate their involvement in antisocial works and their quality time would be beneficial as a whole.
Nevertheless, youngsters would pay a beneficiary settlement that would elaborate their commitment to the community and self to the core. The government could arrange a programme to establish their ability to do some sort of social works and find to spend their free time effectively. Along with that, getting payment during their extra time would encourage them to participate in this sort of activity. Such savings would help them for higher studies or their plans.
To sum up, youngsters free time engagement in social works would be a benefit to the children and community to the core. It would lead to a good and well understanding forthcoming generation and promotion of nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-17 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-06-21 | shwetarani | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | tmai41587 | view | |
| 2023-02-05 | katyhot1 | view | |
| 2022-12-20 | jahidhumayun@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.» You should wr 11
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- As more and more students enter universities academic qualifications are becoming devalued To get ahead in many professions more than one degree is now required and in future it is likely that people will take a number of degree courses before even starti 71
- Over polpulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems. Identify one otlr two serious ones and suggest ways that government and individual can tackle this problem. 84
- Some physiologist recommented that it is important to overcome stress by spending time do nothing. To what extend do you agree or disagree.? 44
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, so, well, for example, kind of, sort of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36394557823 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87275657581 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9541257149 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.642857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262301653877 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954640967885 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707336814715 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175693916421 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00607542360471 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.