Many young people today know more about international pop or movie stars than about famous people in the history of their own country.
Why is this?
What can be done to increase young people’s interest in famous people in the history of their country?
Youngsters are more interested in international celebrities instead of popular historians in their nation. Social media plays a major role in this phenomenon and tackle this problem by school-oriented awareness programmes and authorised creation of historical groups in internet media.
To begin with the effect of social media sites like Facebook, Instagram would lead to young generations focusing on advertisements, new films and brands. They often reject the impact on historical personnel who influence the societies developments and independence except for special occasions and days. Most of the youth spend their quality time chatting, browsing and searching for new traditions and modern technologies instead of past social and historical studies. Media also exaggerated the modern technologies and advertisements with the models, artists and musicians which make new generations concentration on famous peoples attitudes and figures than the actual leaders in society. For instance, most of the channels and radio stations broadcast national history through the fame or voice of stars during the national holidays which exhibit stardom rather than the importance of days and leaders.
Nevertheless, government and educational boards could do an impact on youngsters from the bottom of school periods through theoretical studies and proposals. They can provide projects and assignments regarding the social history of nations to gather data from social websites and different regions. Such materials may enhance the knowledge and attitudes of new generations towards the actual influencers on society. Likewise, the government can reduce the irrelevant advertisements in between the news and search bars. On the other hand, they can publish the biography and milestone of famous leaders in the nation through social media websites. Startup public groups in social sites to get exact details and history of real heroes in history would elaborate the interest and knowledge of young people.
To sum up, with regards to technological development a reverse effect occurred in youth mind in terms of original stars. Even though, the proper guidance and arrangements would flourish the attention and get back the young people to follow the real fighters of the kingdom.
- The table below gives information about population in Australia and Malaysia in 1980 and 2002 77
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009
- Most people try to balance between work and other part of lives Unfortunately not many achieve this delicate balance What are the main problems people are facing What is the best way to overcome them 93
- The average prices per kilometre of clothing imported into the European Union from six different countries in 1993 and 2003 are shown in the bar chart below Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
...s, artists and musicians which make new generations concentration on famous peoples attitud...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, except for, for instance, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68421052632 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96620385493 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576023391813 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.877557304 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161952543576 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491269240626 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441248738167 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916934539443 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00836472026353 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.