The graph above shows the stock price of four technology companies between 2011 and 2016.
The line graph illustrates the stock values of four high-tech corporations on a yearly basis from 2011 to 2016.
Overall, the trajectory of each company stock varied with Facebook increasing steadily whilst Yahoo devaluing by the end of the period. Meanwhile, Apple's value fluctuated throughout the period while Google remained relatively stable.
To begin with, Facebook's stock valuation began with approximately 7,500 in 2011 and continued to ascend until it reached around 20,000 in 2016. In contrast, the descending value of Yahoo made it to the second least of the rank with almost 7,500 in 2011 and ended at about 2,500 by 2016.
Moreover, Apple's trend wildly fluctuated beginning at a value of just under 5,000 in 2011 and reaching its peak in 2012 at nearly 35,000, only fall and rise again at different margins then finally ending to almost the same value where it began. Despite of all the varying changes of the three previously mentioned companies, Google's stock price remained unaffected with its value consistently well under 5,000 over the 6 year period.
- The graph above shows the stock price of four technology companies between 2011 and 2016 77
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 81
- Digital communication technology, such as email, instant messaging and social media, has improved communication and cinnections between people.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opipnion.Give reasons for your answer and include examples fro 73
- The tables below show the value of Australia's trade with China, the USA and Japan from 2012-2015 in billions of Australian dollars. 56
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Overall, the trajectory of each company stock varied with Facebook increasing st...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, second, then, well, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16571428571 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58495490033 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1390975912 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17120669287 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888681127397 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766449821098 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123140575013 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803253734137 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.